I specialize in the evolutionary ecology of plants. Our purpose is to investigate the ultimate cause as to why the ecological characteristics of plants evolved. We engage in theoretical analysis using mathematical models and the empirical research thereof.
Outside of the lab, I enjoy soccer. I am a big fan of Vegalta Sendai and the Japan national team.

Campus | Aobayama campus |
---|---|
Laboratory |
Plant Reproductive Strategy
|
Tel | +81-22-795-6697 |
sakai@tohoku.ac.jp |
Career |
Graduated, Faculty of Science, Kyoto University |
---|---|
Selected Publications |
See the following. |
Activities in Academic Societies |
Ecological Society of Japan |
Teaching |
Plant Evolutionary Ecology (5th semester) |
Recent Activities
We are engaged in analysis using mathematical models and the verification thereof, concerning tradeoffs between seed size and number as well as optimum seed size The problem of how many seeds to create and of what size by using a fixed amount of resources is one that contributes significantly to life cycle strategies in plants. The bigger a seed that is made, the higher the germination rate needs to be of each individual seed. However, the number of seeds that can be produced decreases. Conversely, the smaller the seed that is created, the lower the individual germination rate, but the number of seeds that can be produced increases. So, what are the optimum size and number? Until now, research concerning this problem has hypothesized a tradeoff relationship in which seed size equals the amount of resources invested in seed production divided by the number of seeds. Essentially, the hypothesis is the size and number of seeds are an inverse proportion. The total amount of seed substance (seed size multiplied by seed number) does not change regardless of the number of seeds. However, we have shown theoretically that this inverse proportion tradeoff relationship is not feasible (Sakai and Harada 2001, Evolution 55: 467-476; American Naturalist 157: 348-359). We predict that even if you decrease the number of seeds, the seed size does not increase to the extent of a true inverse proportion (figure). The total amount of seed substance decreases the more you decrease the number of seeds. This occurs because resources decrease in value during seed production due to maintenance respiration (see our papers for details). Under Sakai and Harada’s tradeoff, sacrificing seed size to increase the number of seeds is advantageous, and, as such, optimum seed size is smaller than optimum seed size under the inverse proportion tradeoff. These predictions are backed by testing using Cardiocrinum cordatum (Sakai and Sakai 2005, Oikos 108:105-114).